【#metoo】26年前提控證據不足 活地養女電視公開:我被他性侵犯

撰文:林穎嵐
出版:更新:

著名美國導演活地亞倫(Woody Allen),1992年被養女Dylan Farrow曾公開指控活地亞倫曾對她性騷擾,但最後卻因證據不足而於1993年被法官駁回起訴;事隔26年,現年32歲的Dylan Farrow今日(18日)報接受美國電視台CBS節目《CBS This Morning》專訪,首度公開7歲時遭活地亞倫在家中閣樓被他施暴性侵的經歷。

「我被父親帶到康涅狄格州、我母親的鄉間小屋裡的一個小閣樓,他叫我躺下來,玩我弟弟的玩具火車,他坐在我後面的門口,當我玩玩具火車時,我被他性侵犯......作為一個7歲的孩子,我會形容,他摸了我的下體。」Dylan指當時其母正在外購物,主持人問她:「你跟母親說時,她有甚麼反應?」「她很傷心,但我當時感覺是,好像是我做錯事一樣。」她形容母親當時帶她去看兒科,當醫生問她被父親摸了哪些部位時,她只指向膊頭。「媽媽當時問我為甚麼不將我告訴她的告訴醫生?我跟她說我感到很尷尬。最後我們就當沒事回家。」

 

Dylan Farrow(左)較早前在訪問中親述7歲時被性侵的經過。

早在1992年,當年只有7歲的Dylan Farrow曾透露遭當時的養父活地亞倫性騷擾並報警求助,但礙於證據不足,而且Dylan當年道出事件的時間點,剛好是其母、當年活地的同居女友Mia Farrow與活地鬧分手的同一時期,因而被指是Mia Farrow因妒成恨,教唆女兒誣告活地亞倫,令該宗案件在1993年被法官駁回。

【電影大亨性騷擾風波】29歲活地亞倫子揭發事件 耶魯小鮮肉爆紅 

【電影大亨性騷擾風波】強迫口交 裸體現身 安祖蓮娜也受害 

當年活地亞倫的同居女友Mia Farrow(右)與他當時的養女Dylan Farrow。

至2014年,當年28歲的Dylan Farrow在《New York Times》撰寫一封公開信,信中提及當年活地對她所做的事,當中包括「亞倫穿著內衣和她睡覺」、「為了躲他,我會躲起來」,但當時活地亞倫僅表示:「不真實和可恥。」《CBS This Morning》主持人曾反問Dylan:「你認為現在的人為什麼會相信你?」她回答:「我不知道,我只能夠說出事實,我只能說我可信的,我說的都是真話。我認為重要的是,人們要認識到受害人,一個原告很重要,他們相信便足以改變這件事。」

(左起)Mia Farrow、兒子Satche、Woody Allen及Dylan。

在訪談節目播出後,活地亞倫發表聲明回應事件,他指:「這個指控在首次提出至今已超過25年, Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital及New York State Child Welfare均調查了很多個月,它們均獨立地斷定沒有發生任何騷擾事件。他們亦發現,這可能是一個沒主事權的孩子被一名因為分手而憤怒的母親指使的行為。」

 

 

活地亞倫回應全文:

When this claim was first made more than 25 years ago, it was thoroughly investigated by both the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital and New York State Child Welfare. They both did so for many months and independently concluded that no molestation had ever taken place. Instead, they found it likely a vulnerable child had been coached to tell the story by her angry mother during a contentious breakup.)

Dylan's older brother Moses has said that he witnessed their mother doing exactly that – relentlessly coaching Dylan, trying to drum into her that her father was a dangerous sexual predator. It seems to have worked – and, sadly, I'm sure Dylan truly believes what she says.

But even though the Farrow family is cynically using the opportunity afforded by the Time's Up movement to repeat this discredited allegation, that doesn't make it any more true today than it was in the past. I never molested my daughter – as all investigations concluded a quarter of a century ago.